DAILYJILI Game Providers — Every Studio Covered Here
Across 6 pages, this section deals with game providers.
Key facts and contents
- DAILYJILI CQ9 Gaming Games
- CQ9 Gaming counts as a game studio instead of an operator.
- DAILYJILI Evolution Games
- Evolution sits on the studio side, as a game studio, and not on the operator side.
- DAILYJILI JILI Games
- JILI works as a game studio and does not act as an operator.
- DAILYJILI JDB Gaming Games
- The operator label does not fit JDB Gaming, which is a game studio.
- DAILYJILI PG Soft Games
- PG Soft counts as a game studio; it is not an operator.
- DAILYJILI Pragmatic Play Games
- Pragmatic Play makes games as a studio and does not act as an operator.
The most frequent error in this corner of the subject is mixing up a game studio and a casino, which are different companies answering to different regulators. Studios whose titles appear in Philippine-facing lobbies are the subject of these pages, which explain who each is, what it is actually licensed to do, and whether it publishes a return-to-player figure that anyone can check. There are 6 pages below.
Everything in this section
| Studio | Publishes RTP | Specialisms | Licence position |
|---|---|---|---|
| JILI | No | slots, fishing games | PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department) |
| PG Soft | Yes | slots | Malta Gaming Authority |
| Evolution | Yes | live dealer casino, live game shows | Malta Gaming Authority |
| JDB Gaming | No | fish shooting games, slots | PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department) |
| CQ9 Gaming | No | slots, fishing games | PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department) |
| Pragmatic Play | Yes | slots, live casino | Malta Gaming Authority |
Each of the 6 pages deals with one entry on its own, with no summary of several. A field above that reads “not published” has the entry’s own page behind it, and that page explains who would have had to publish it.
Each entry in a paragraph
Each entry says just enough for you to judge whether its page merits opening.
JILI explained
It puts out no founding year and names no headquarters. Its output covers bingo, table and card games, fishing games and slots.
Opening its page, the first record listed reads PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department). JILI titles sit within the list of electronic games that PAGCOR EGLD has approved.
It publishes no RTP. This site quotes no figure for its titles; the numbers that circulate elsewhere are estimates from third parties that contradict one another.
PG Soft explained
Founded 2015, based in Valletta, Malta. Builds slots.
The record at the top of its page is Malta Gaming Authority. Licence MGA/B2B/435/2017, then, and the company holding it is Pocket Games Software Limited (C 76195).
It puts RTP on the record, so any figure quoted for one of its titles leads back to the studio. The RTP figure sits in the data the server sends with the page, since PG Soft publishes RTP in its game data, but the page a visitor sees renders only a blank dash.
The Evolution entry
Founded 2006, based in Stockholm, Sweden. Builds live dealer casino, live game shows.
The record at the top of its page is Malta Gaming Authority. MGA/CRP/187/2010 is the licence, and Evolution Gaming Malta Limited holds it.
It puts RTP on the record, so any figure quoted for one of its titles leads back to the studio. Recorded as publishing RTP given that Evolution’s game-show titles have RTP figures reported the same way by third-party sources..
JDB Gaming explained
It puts out no founding year and names no headquarters. Builds fish shooting games, slots.
Opening its page, the first record listed reads PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department). PAGCOR keeps a web-readable list of its approvals for game content.
It publishes no RTP. This site quotes no figure for its titles; the numbers that circulate elsewhere are estimates from third parties that contradict one another.
CQ9 Gaming in full
It puts out no founding year and names no headquarters. It builds arcade games, table games, fishing games and slots.
Opening its page, the first record listed reads PAGCOR (Electronic Gaming Licensing Department). PAGCOR gathers its game content approvals into a list published on its website.
It publishes no RTP. This site quotes no figure for its titles; the numbers that circulate elsewhere are estimates from third parties that contradict one another.
Pragmatic Play in full
Founded 2015, based in Gibraltar. Its output spans virtual sports, crash games, bingo, live casino and slots.
The record at the top of its page is Malta Gaming Authority. Pragmatic Solutions MT Limited holds the licence, MGA/B2B/619/2018.
It puts RTP on the record, so any figure quoted for one of its titles leads back to the studio. The top of a set is what that figure is, given that on its own game pages Pragmatic publishes just one RTP for each title.
Use the game itself to check game providers details
You are not expected to take any of this on faith. Each licence claim made on these pages was sourced from a public register, and every one of those registers is open:
- Looking up a Malta licence means opening the MGA authorisation portal and searching the company name, not the brand name. Licensees are frequently subsidiaries under other names: the Malta licence of Pragmatic Play is held by Pragmatic Solutions MT Limited, not by anything called Pragmatic Play.
- A UK licence can be looked up on the Gambling Commission public register, using the account number. Each activity on an active licence is listed with its start date, and the same record also shows any regulatory settlement made against the holder.
- The studio’s approved-games PDF, hosted on pagcor.ph, is where you find a PAGCOR EGLD listing. Look at what the approval covers: game content supplied to licensed operators. The studio holds a licence only where the document says that it does.
- Open the studio’s own page for the specific title when you want its RTP figure. No comparison site can provide a figure that does not exist, and when two comparison sites contradict one another, the clash is itself the finding.
The thing most often got wrong here
Above everything else here, you need to tell a PAGCOR EGLD listing apart from a PAGCOR operator licence. A studio appearing in an EGLD listing has had its game content approved by PAGCOR for use by the operators PAGCOR licenses. As a licence it belongs to no studio, and it tells you nothing about whichever casinos carry those games.
Nothing beyond that exists for four of the seven studios below. Every one of their pages spells that out, since “PAGCOR listed” and “PAGCOR licensed” differ by just one word yet sit worlds apart, and the latter is typically what a reader hopes to have found.
Finding game providers at DAILYJILI
- Sign in at DAILYJILI and open the game lobby.
- Narrow the lobby to one studio, or look for a title using its name.
- The stake range and paytable are on a game’s info screen, so open it and read them before you play.
- Put a session budget in place first, then open every new studio at a low stake.
FAQ
Among these studios, which put out an RTP figure?
PG Soft, Evolution, Pragmatic Play. The rest do not publish one, so no RTP is quoted on this site for their titles, and none is taken from a comparison site.
Does a studio licence protect a player?
Not directly. A studio licence extends to the business that develops the games. Where a player seeks recourse, the path leads to the operator's regulator, whose licence is a separate one held by another company.
Does DAILYJILI carry all of these studios?
Open Games in the DAILYJILI lobby: each game tile names its studio, so you can see which ones are live for you. The description of each studio on these pages is taken from its own published record.
In what way does a PAGCOR licence set itself apart from a PAGCOR EGLD listing?
A studio's game content is approved for use by operators PAGCOR licenses whenever it carries an EGLD listing. The party holding a PAGCOR licence is the operator, and the licence gives it authority to run a casino. Among the studios here, the first is held by four, while the second is held by none.
Why is it that some studios here come without a founding year or headquarters?
Because they do not publish one. Neither figure shows up anywhere on the sites that JILI, JDB Gaming and CQ9 Gaming run themselves. Numbers for both float around affiliate listicles without a primary source, so none of them is repeated here.
Can you treat a game as fair just because a GLI or BMM certification exists for it?
It indicates that the random number generator and the paytable have been tested against a standard by an independent test laboratory. It matters, though it is a different thing from a licence, and neither says a word about whichever operator is offering the game.